By Devanik Saha/ IndiaSpend.org
Catastrophic maternal healthcare expenses push 46.6 per cent mothers in India into poverty — with the illiterate being especially susceptible — according to a December 2016 study by researchers from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee (IIT-R). The expenses include childbirth, ante-natal care and post-natal care expenses.
Catastrophic expenditure is greater than or equal to 40 per cent of a household’s non-subsistence income, i.e. income available after basic needs have been met, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). The threshold of 40 per cent can differ according to countries, said the WHO; the 2016 study has analysed the data at two thresholds: 10 and 40 per cent.
As many as 63 per cent households nationwide had a catastrophic maternal health expenditure of 40 per cent, the study — which analysed data from the National Sample Survey Office — found.
Among states and Union territories (UTs), 65.7 per cent households (among those where a woman had delivered) in Telangana were pushed into poverty — more than any other state/UT — due to childbearing expenses, followed by Chhattisgarh (53.7 per cent) and Puducherry (53.4 per cent).
In the 10 years to 2014, out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending has pushed 50.6 million people back into poverty.
Households where the mothers were illiterate were the most affected, with 61 per cent of them being pushed into poverty –despite having the lowest maternal health out-of-pocket expenditure at Rs 3,600 — compared to 36.7 per cent of households where women were graduates and above, who had an out-of-pocket expenditure of Rs 19,250.
More illiterate women prefer public hospitals for delivery in both rural (79.2 per cent) and urban areas (67.7 per cent), which possibly explains their low out-of-pocket.
Among women of different social groups, women belonging to scheduled tribes (STs) had the least maternal out-of-pocket expenditure at Rs 2,962, but 71.5 per cent of them were pushed into poverty. As many as 85 per cent ST women in rural areas delivered in public hospitals — more than any other social group.
The study holds relevance in the context of the central government announcement on May 18, 2017, that it is revising the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (Maternity Benefit Programme), announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on December 31, 2016, by restricting the scheme to firstborns instead of “first two live births” as applicable earlier.
The programme aims to give Rs 6,000 to pregnant women for childbearing expenses. The scheme saw an increase of 226 per cent in allocation in the 2017-18 budget from Rs 634 crore to Rs 2,700 crore. However, the government had estimated that the annual requirement for the maternity benefit scheme would be Rs 14,512 crore, according to a report in The Indian Express.
The 2016 study revealed that, on average, a woman incurred an OOP expenditure of Rs 8,543 on childbearing. There were huge variations among states — from Rs 2,801 in Uttarakhand to Rs 15,433 in Telangana.
“The most vulnerable women who are trying to reach out for the government aid won’t be able to get it,” Tania Sheshadri, an independent community health researcher who works with rural women in Karnataka, was recently quoted as saying in news reports.
“In most parts of the country, there is a two-child norm and a scheme like this will not benefit most women. The government should concentrate on quality care for pregnant women and make available the benefits to every woman who reaches a government health care centre.”
A limitation of the 2016 study is that it does not consider the benefits of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY, motherhood protection scheme), a 12-year-old government programme focused specially on 10 states with low rates of institutional delivery — Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Rajasthan, Odisha, and Jammu and Kashmir — termed as low-performing states (LPS).
Under the programme, pregnant women in rural areas who live below the poverty line are to be given cash assistance — Rs 700 in high performing states and Rs 1,400 in low performing states — irrespective of the mother’s age and number of children so that they opt for birth in a government or accredited private health facility.
The scheme has failed to cover the poorest women, according to a 2014 analysis of JSY data by researchers from Georgetown University. As many as 60 per cent women in Uttar Pradesh said they had to pay for certain public maternal health services, according to an assessment of JSY conducted by United Nations Population Fund in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh in 2012.
(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data-driven, non-profit, public interest journalism platform. Devanik Saha is with the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. The views expressed are those of IndiaSpend. Feedback at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can read the report here: http://www.indiaspend.com/cover-story/childbearing-expenses-push-47-of-indian-women-into-poverty-47627)